top 10 me dating: a pragmatic field guide

Define the "me" metric first

I'm building a personal leaderboard, not a shrine to chemistry. The goal is simple: evaluate quickly, iterate gently, and keep the list tight. I lean on observable behaviors over vibes - messages, scheduling, follow-through. I'm open to surprise, yet I protect time. I could be slightly off on a given day's weighting, but patterns win.

A compact scoring rubric (10 inputs)

  1. Intent fit (timeline clarity)
  2. Calendar compatibility (reschedulings per month)
  3. Communication latency (median reply delay)
  4. Curiosity density (questions asked vs. answers)
  5. Value alignment (examples, not slogans)
  6. Conflict preview (small-friction handling)
  7. Logistics radius (transit realism)
  8. Energy rhythm (weekday vs. weekend)
  9. Joy-per-minute signal
  10. Growth adjacency (mutual stretch)

Workflow for speed without rushing

I score light-touch after the second exchange and adjust post-first call. A quick traffic-light system gates effort: green gets a date slot, yellow earns one clarifying question, red is a polite close. On the F train between Jay St and Carroll, I triaged two chats in six minutes and freed a Thursday evening - no guilt, higher ROI.

Calibration tips: anchor scores to concrete moments; track only deltas that change decisions; review weekly. If two candidates tie, prefer the one who offers specifics (time, place, backup). Efficiency isn't cold; it's respectful - to them and my bandwidth. I'm confident this keeps the top 10 fresh, even if one or two rankings float week to week.




dtmeetvg
4.9 stars -1783 reviews